The University of Notre Dame does not redshirt, and I endorse that policy completely. I am very much in favor of redshirting, but not at Notre Dame. But there’s no doubt about it. It puts us at a huge disadvantage.

Religion is compulsory in English schools, you know.

Barack Obama did tell me that I was one of Michelle Obama’s favorite actors.

Dollywood is a family park, and all families are welcome. We do have a policy about profanity or controversial messages on clothing or signs. It is to protect the individual wearing or carrying them, as well as to keep down fights or problems by those opposed to it at the park.

Prohibition is better than no liquor at all.

The immigration issue is, I recognize, one that generates a lot of passion, but it does not make sense for us to want to push talent out.

I have a very strict gun control policy: if there’s a gun around, I want to be in control of it.

Peace and friendship with all mankind is our wisest policy, and I wish we may be permitted to pursue it.

There is probably a perverse pride in my administration… that we were going to do the right thing, even if short-term it was unpopular. And I think anybody who’s occupied this office has to remember that success is determined by an intersection in policy and politics and that you can’t be neglecting of marketing and P.R. and public opinion.

Among the friends of Union, there is great diversity of sentiment and of policy in regard to slavery and the African race among us.

Every nation has to follow a certain policy: Commercial, trade, various other types of policies.

We’ve used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we’re running a federal deficit that’s 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It’s more stimulative than any policy we’ve followed since World War II.

I have not endorsed Trump and will not do so.

No policy that does not rest upon some philosophical public opinion can be permanently maintained.

The economy’s always been the engine for our national security.

A Conservative Government is an organized hypocrisy.

We can’t have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.

A public man must never forget that he loses his usefulness when he as an individual, rather than his policy, becomes the issue.

I like policy. It’s why I decided to enter government. The other thing I like about government – you have good days, you have bad days, but you never have a boring day, and that’s important to me.

A policy is a temporary creed liable to be changed, but while it holds good it has got to be pursued with apostolic zeal.

The U.S. immigration laws are bad – really, really bad. I’d say treatment of immigrants is one of the greatest injustices done in our government’s name.

I didn’t play soccer; I played that other football in grade school through college.

I do have a political agenda. It’s to have as few regulations as possible.

The one who adapts his policy to the times prospers, and likewise that the one whose policy clashes with the demands of the times does not.

I’m opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being from access to public safety, public education, or public health, period.

Nonviolence is a good policy when the conditions permit.

It is part of the general pattern of misguided policy that our country is now geared to an arms economy which was bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and nurtured upon an incessant propaganda of fear.

First, how do we give everyone a fair shot at opportunity and security in this new economy? Second, how do we make technology work for us, and not against us – especially when it comes to solving urgent challenges like climate change? Third, how do we keep America safe and lead the world without becoming its policeman?

It’s one thing to be religious, but it’s another thing to make religion your policy.

You know we’re going to control the insurance companies.

When a new source of taxation is found it never means, in practice, that the old source is abandoned. It merely means that the politicians have two ways of milking the taxpayer where they had one before.

When I left the University of Notre Dame, I honestly felt I would never coach again.

Justice is itself the great standing policy of civil society; and any eminent departure from it, under any circumstances, lies under the suspicion of being no policy at all.

I disagree with any policy that would turn America’s back on people who are fleeing harm. I frankly believe that it is contrary to everything that we have symbolically and actually said we stand for.

I had practiced with the team, and the first scheduled game was with the University of Missouri. They made it quite clear to the Army that they would not play a team with a black player on it. Instead of telling me the truth, the Army gave me leave to go home.

In the United States, one of the main topics of academic political science is the study of attitudes and policy and their correlation. The study of attitudes is reasonably easy in the United States: heavily-polled society, pretty serious and accurate polls, and policy you can see, and you can compare them.

The Cuban model doesn’t even work for us anymore.

I like policy – call me a nerd.

If you’re in favour of any policy – reform, revolution, stability, regression, whatever – if you’re at least minimally moral, it’s because you think it’s somehow good for people. And good for people means conforming to their fundamental nature.

One of the peculiarities of Delhi is that the term ‚reform‘ is associated only with passing of laws in Parliament. In fact, the most important reforms are those needed, without new laws, at various level of the government, in work practices and procedures.

The fundamental question I believe is, ‚Is political Islam in our best interest?‘ If not, what is our policy to authoritatively support the countervailing forces?

Every nation whose affairs betray a want of wisdom and stability may calculate on every loss which can be sustained from the more systematic policy of its wiser neighbors.

The effort to try to present the Social Security program as if it’s a major problem, that’s just a hidden way of trying to undermine and destroy it.

Generally speaking, the public appetite for criminal justice policy is just tough talk.

By definition, a government has no conscience. Sometimes it has a policy, but nothing more.